case law citation us - An Overview
case law citation us - An Overview
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The loads of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
However, decisions rendered via the Supreme Court on the United States are binding on all federal courts, and on state courts regarding issues from the Constitution and federal law.
The loads of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is actually made apparent that police is free to get action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities issue to legislation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. In case the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and they shall be assigned non-field duties in the interim period. Read more
thirteen . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some duration, both parties have agreed to the disposal of the moment petition on the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner along with private respondents and will get care of the many facets of the case and guarantee that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
These past decisions are called "case regulation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Enable the decision stand"—is definitely the principle by which judges are bound to these kinds of past decisions, drawing on founded judicial authority to formulate their positions.
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice from the Peace u/s 22-A isn't obliged to afford a possibility of hearing to your accused party; nor obliged to automatically or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to think about all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a number of the relevant factors. Read more
We're an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of law and to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed from the Constitution and laws in the United States and this State.
ten. Without touching the merits in the case of your issue of annual increases inside the pensionary emoluments on the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of your provincial government, this kind of annual increase, if permissible during the case of employees of KMC, requires further assessment being made from the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance resulting from funding issues and deficiency of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the conclusion or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mold the relief to really make it correct to your facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified with the decision with the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: click here 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions are classified as the opinions that are filed within the day that the appellate court issues its decision and are frequently not the court's final opinion.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar challenge. When they sue their landlord, the court must use the previous court’s decision in making use of the regulation. This example of case law refers to two cases listened to inside the state court, for the same level.
Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there could possibly be a single or more judgments given (or reported). Only the reason with the decision on the majority can represent a binding precedent, but all can be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning can be adopted in an argument.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It is usually a nicely-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is issue to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.